In
any given day, consumers of information and content will opt in and out of a
number of lists. Many don’t realize what
they’re signing up for nor will they remember that they signed up for any of
this stuff. Additionally, people will
respond to an email, sometimes hastily, by opting out, asking the sender to
never contact them again. It seems kind
of harsh to just dismiss a person or organization for life, just because in a
split second you decided you didn’t need whatever was being shared or
offered. How is all of this opting in
and out impacting our lives?
There
no doubt is a lot of inbox clutter and junk mail out there. Some is way off target, such as a Viagra ad
to a little old lady. Some seems irrelevant
to us and some challenge our values and views.
But a lot of email is really not so offensive or wasteful – it’s just
not seen as relevant or useful for the moment.
I think there should be another designation for emails like this. They may not be true SPAM or something
demanding you opt-in or out of. They are
just low-priority emails that may hold value down the road.
When
you send emails to market your book, brand yourself, or sell something, you
hope that the recipients won’t see you as spam or an intrusion. But, if you send enough emails, you are sure
to get critics of your approach and outreach.
It
frustrates me when people overreact to an email. They go through great pains to let everyone
know they don’t like being contacted or they don’t like your offer or
message. Don’t they have better things
to do with their lives than to whine about one email?
For
instance, people forget they opted-in, so any opposition they have to being
emailed by you is ridiculous.
Second,
if an email is targeted in who gets it and the message presented or offered is relevant to them, then what’s the big deal? Just don’t
over send emails. For instance, I get
almost daily emails from a local but unnamed sports team .I
love my baseball team but it gets to be annoying to be pitched that often.
Third,
regardless of whether you think an email was SPAM or not, you shouldn’t think
that invites you to respond rudely or crudely.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
What is there to be gained in spending any effort in arguing with people
who email you a service or product that could be of use to you?
Online
marketing and communication is still a growing and developing medium. We need to balance the needs of a marketer
and the desires of the consumer.
Just
as marketers need to understand the needs, desires, demands, and habits of
consumers, those who consume should balance tolerance, understanding, and
compassion for those who try their best to give you relevant and valuable
offers.
Consumers
can opt-out, press delete, or otherwise choose to ignore a message, but when
they cross the line and look to publicly shame or cause professional
harm to the marketer, they have done a disservice to the ecosystem of ideas,
news, ads, and connections that people have come to love about the Internet.
Marketers
must act responsibly and take extra steps to filter and update lists. They need to, as often as possible, be better
matchmakers in connecting a consumer to the exact product or services desired
or needed. But they are not perfect.
I
think we’re getting so used to skipping commercials via DVRs, streaming
downloads on demand, and viewing ad-free content that we forget in order for the
economy to function at a healthy pace, marketing must do its role to reach
consumers. Once we accept we live in a
world that includes marketing, we’ll be much better for it.
Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas
expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer, Media
Connect, the nation’s largest book promoter. You can follow him on Twitter
@theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important
when discussed in the third-person. This is copyrighted by
BookMarketingBuzzBlog © 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.