People
are more willing to share links than they are to read the links that they
share. According to a study reported by the New
York Daily News, Columbia University and the French National Institute
found that only two in five people will click through and read the story they
receive from links on social media. The
other three in five will share the story to friends, colleagues, and followers
without having actually read what they passed on.
It
could be the study is flawed in some way or perhaps it is society that is
flawed. We live in a culture that thinks
nothing about liking, sharing, and retweeting content that it doesn’t even look
at. The empty testimonial granted by the
person sharing unread links means nothing.
Worse, people may read something because they assume a trusted source
read, liked, and agreed with it. It just
goes to show you that you can’t even trust those that you trust when it comes
to information.
It’s
hard enough to validate the accuracy or legitimacy of a social media post or
link and it gets messier when we believe a trusted third party looked into it
and recommended it to us.
Another
point of concern about social media is that a lot of claims get made in tweets
or short FB posts that may come from a bigger story or study, but because
social media is fast and short, we can’t always discern the accuracy or
veracity of the content. As you can see,
people quickly share stuff they don’t read or even agree with, let alone study
deeper.
So
what might this mean for authors and book promoters? Well for one, you should realize that your
links may get circulated, but not necessarily read. Catchy headers and strong visuals could be
enough to induce people to pass your stuff along but it may take something else
to read it. And when they read it, how
often will that yield an action step such as buying your book?
We’re
quick to send out or share content but as suspected, we don’t have the time to
read everything that’s floating around in the social media universe. We should not take it as an indication of
support or popularity. When something was re-tweeted a million times or
liked on Facebook, because people are just doing it automatically without much
thought or concern.
The
math in the study sounds crazy. The
study examined the Twitter pages for five major news outlets over a one-month
period last summer and found that the posts had a combined 2.8 million shares,
reaching 75 billion people – but yielded only 9.6 million clicks.
“People
are more willing to share an article than read it,” Arnaud Legout, the study’s
co-author, said in a statement. “This is
typical of modern information consumption.
People form an opinion based on a summary, or summary of summaries,
without making the effort to go deeper.”
RECENT STORIES
Is it time to self-publish?
10 tenets of free speech
Antique car show inspires ideas for marketing books
Do writers know the truth?
Would you buy book insurance?
Have you surveyed your readers?
Google This: Book Thieves Earn Supreme Court Win
Are Any Stories Foreign To Us?
We Need A Reading Bee, Not Just A Spelling Bee
Twitter Racks Up Losses
2016 Book Marketing & Book Publicity Toolkit
Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and
ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer. You
can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him
at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the
third-person. This is copyrighted by BookMarketingBuzzBlog © 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.