I’ve
always wondered if the government uses copyright law to get a heads-up on what
books will say before they are published.
Often, many books apply for copyright before they are released to the
public. Do you think there are thousands of workers combing through these
manuscripts to learn what people have to say before the masses learn about
them?
There is a distinct advantage given to the government when it learns things
before others do. Based on the information contained in these books, it could:
·
Change
its policies, procedures, plans, or priorities.
·
Begin
to form a defense against an accusation.
·
Use
information to make certain financial investments.
·
Take
pre-emptive actions.
·
Start
to cover its tracks
·
Improve
its military or security strategy.
·
Build
a case to arrest someone.
·
Gain
insight to prosecute an entity.
·
Destroy
evidence of a controversial program.
Okay,
so maybe I’ve been exposed to one conspiracy theory too many, but it makes
sense. Sure, copyrights are issued to
protect the domain of a writer’s original work, but don’t you wonder if the
government uses it to its own advantage?
What if the government learns the details of a book that will release
information it doesn’t want leaked? Could the government then
blackmail/threaten /pay-off the author to not publish such materials? Or maybe the government, upon being alerted to what will be published, prepares a smear campaign to discredit the author
and book before it’s released. Or how
about the government, upon learning of a book’s contents, doesn’t squash the
book but instead asks the author to make changes that are favorable to the
government?
Patents
are the same thing. While the government
serves its function by ascertaining who owns the rights to certain creations,
it is secretly looking to apply such ideas, technology or techniques to serve
its own interests and needs – well before any of it is actually available to
the public. I think the copyright office
is doing the same with books.
Here’s
another thought. What if the copyright
office doesn’t record your book, word for word, and instead purposely edits out
certain passages and then adopts its version into the permanent record?
Considering
the government already spies on us, manipulates the financial markets, fixes legal cases, and does whatever is needed to keep us safe, protect America’s
interests, or serve the needs of corrupt politicians, why wouldn’t it violate
the copyright process for its own needs? Hey, I have zero proof here and am
just speculating on a “what-if,” but seriously, what if I’m right?
The Author PR Priority List
22 Bad Things Writers Should Avoid
Recent Posts
Can the book world recover from PublishingGate?
http://bookmarketingbuzzblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/can-book-world-recover-from.html
Should there be guidelines for authors to follow?
http://bookmarketingbuzzblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/are-there-any-standards-in-place-for.html
What should authors not write about?
http://bookmarketingbuzzblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/what-shouldnt-authors-write-about.html
Will we never see another Shakespeare?
http://bookmarketingbuzzblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/will-we-ever-manufacture-another.htmlThe Author PR Priority List
Rights of Cheating Spouses vs. First Amendment On Display
22 Bad Things Writers Should Avoid
Can authors audit their writing like they do their taxes?
What is America’s actual reading capacity?
2016 Book Marketing & Book Publicity Toolkit
Brian Feinblum’s views, opinions, and ideas expressed in this blog are his alone and not that of his employer. You can follow him on Twitter @theprexpert and email him at brianfeinblum@gmail.com. He feels more important when discussed in the third-person. This is copyrighted by BookMarketingBuzzBlog © 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.