Here’s
something that has not been fully nor meaningfully explored. With the continued surge in self-publishing
and the production of some 3,000 new titles daily (from traditional, indie and
self), the public is clearly being given a choice on what books to read. Further, the filters and gatekeepers of the
major publishers no longer solely determine which ideas and stories get to be
seen and heard. But with all of this
freedom and the explosion in book releases on topics of all sizes and shapes,
noting new has come from it. The truth
is out there, but is anyone listening?
What I’m
saying is that if someone has an experience, a viewpoint, a theory, a complaint,
an idea, a fantasy or a real newsworthy statement, he or she has easy access to
publish a book – or a blog – or release videos and images via numerous social
media outlets. But with all of these
communication vehicles available, what’s been made public that the big
publishing houses had kept us from seeing?
Not
much, or so it appears.
The new
problem now is not in a writer having the availability and means to be
published – uncensored – but in his or her ability to actually be read or
heard. It seems everyone has something
to say, but not enough of us are listening.
What if
Jesus was reincarnated and wrote a book or someone uncovered an important scientific
formula or a psychiatrist came up with a way for people to stop doing harmful
behaviors? Would you even know about the
book? Would you have time to read it? How would you go about validating its
veracity and accuracy?
I’m
afraid we’ve reached a saturation point in the information circulating out
there. Does this mean fewer books should be published? Not necessarily, but we need a better way of
cataloging, reviewing, and summarizing each book so that people can not only
find what they need but learn about what they didn’t know exists.
The news
media, to a degree, tries to do this for us, but it’s understaffed and limited
in its coverage. Social media has opened
up dialogues on all things, but when we’re all talking at one another it’s hard
to hear anything. We lack a singular trusted, trained, unbiased source to
comprehensively evaluate all books by an objective standard. Without having a national librarian to do
this, we swim in deep water without a life preserver. So many ideas and so much knowledge can be at
our fingertips but it overwhelms, confuses, and suffocates us.
The
pendulum has shifted over the years. At
one point, little confirmation was disseminated or even known. Now most of the population has access to a
ton of media and books. But we still
await the discovery of greater truths and we still wait for society to act on
the knowledge that is uncovered and disseminated. Tons of books are out there on diets, but
we’re an obese nation. Plenty of books
warning about environmental degradation but little is done to save the
planet. Many books on personal finance,
but people still can’t stay out of debt.
Are we
really prepared – mentally, physically, or intellectually – to learn something
new that could alter our understanding of the world? We want our books to teach us, to help us
dream, and to be inspiring – but when such books are published, do we really
embrace them and fulfill their message?
Perhaps
we have a lot of books out there that cover a handful of topics or themes that simply mirror one another. We think there’s so much choice in what to read but
maybe millions of books only reflect a few thousand ideas of which we choose to
incorporate only a few hundred into our lives.
If a
life-changing book is published would you know it exists? Would you read it? Would you act on it?
Please
Read These Posts
Book promoters can still learn from
Donald Trump
Is it that time for your book
marketing makeover?
Book Shepherd Reveals How You Can Get
Published Successfully
When Is Book Publishing’s Fight of the Century?
How will book marketers turn a yes
into something more?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.